In News, Reviews

By David Pogue – NY Times – April 7,2011

If you want an easy puzzle, solve a Rubik’s Cube.

If you want something more challenging, balance the national budget.

But if you really want a head-pounder, try making a tiny camera with a big sensor.

The problem is physics. A big sensor records superior light, color and detail. But to flood its surface with light, the lens has to be big and be a certain distance away.

That’s why, for years, there were two kinds of cameras: pocket models, with tiny sensors that produce blurry or grainy photos in low light and S.L.R. cameras, those big-sensor, big-body, heavy black beasts used by professionals.

In the last couple of years, though, things have changed. There’s a new class of camera whose size (both body and sensor) falls in between those two time-honored extremes. They represent a rethinking of every single design element, a jettisoning of every nonessential component, in pursuit of a tiny, big-sensor camera. Because that, after all, is what the world really wants.

Read more:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/07/technology/personaltech/07pogue.html?_r=1&ref=technology

Recommended Posts
Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!